Lance Stephenson
Grade: B-
Tim Hiley: For me, Lance Stephenson’s stint at the Clippers was a bit of a roller coaster. When they traded Matt Barnes and Spencer Hawes last year for Lance, I was completely torn as to how I felt.
Part of me was screaming at why the Clippers traded for Stephenson when he had shot an appalling percentage in Charlotte, received several DNPs because he was more detrimental to the team than beneficial, and there were whispers about his attitude. Ultimately, they didn’t lose much and they’ve got someone with massive potential and with the experience to help out the side.
There were mixed messages and mixed signals from coach Rivers, as one game Stephenson played 30 minutes, the next he played 2 minutes, the next he got a DNP (coach’s decision), the next he played 19 and then the following game played just five minutes. Talk about mixed messages!
More from Clipperholics
- Grade the trade: Clippers shockingly land Trae Young in wild proposal
- 3 of the most overpaid players on the LA Clippers’ roster
- Trading for this player covers the Clippers’ biggest weakness
- How will the LA Clippers fare in the in-season tournament?
- Why the LA Clippers should steer clear of recent gold medalist waiver
Then, oddly, he started playing really well for the Clippers, just before they traded him. In eight of the final ten games of his Clippers career (the other two were DNPs), he hit 28 of his final 38 shots. He virtually won a game on his own versus the Magic, where he hit all six of his shots.
During those last eight appearances, he was averaging a solid 8 points, 3 boards, 1 assist while shooting 73 percent from the field and 71 percent from deep in just 16 minutes per game. He was playing incredibly efficiently and was becoming comfortable with his role, providing energy off the bench and playing at a very useful level. So when they opted to acquire Green, I was sad to see Stephenson go, but I was pleased to get Jeff Green.
Ultimately, I think they made the right call, as Green was similar to Lance in many ways. He’s a good defender, can contribute in a number of ways and can score 24 in a game, then go scoreless one night later. Green is slightly more consistent and slightly less erratic. When Green is on his game, he can produce more than Stephenson.
Next: Thank you for Mbah a Moute, Kings